The current political climate in the United States has been plagued by a seemingly endless stream of lies and deception from those in positions of power. It’s no secret that politicians are often less than truthful, but the level of dishonesty and manipulation that has become the norm in recent years is truly unprecedented. At the forefront of this trend are conservative leaders and media figures who have mastered the art of deception and have turned it into a dangerous weapon in their quest for power and control.
We pulled some interesting sections from the AP News report today.
In the texts, she bemoaned the state of American politics and called the election a “heist.” Thomas told the panel she still feels there were election irregularities, but she does believe that Joe Biden is the president of the United States.
While Thomas urged Meadows to act, and she is married to one of nine Supreme Court justices who were at the time reviewing Trump’s election challenges, investigators did not believe she played a major role in Trump’s efforts to overturn the election or his inaction as the violent insurrection unfolded.
Thomas characterized herself as an “instigator” of Groundswell and other conservative advocacy groups that have met weekly as a coalition for years. She and her husband are longtime associates of conservative lawyer John Eastman, an architect of the scheme to have several 2020 battleground states send alternative electors for Trump, rather than Biden.
Thomas said that while she was interested in pursuing claims of voter fraud, she had largely stepped aside during the aftermath of the election because she felt her presence as the wife of Justice Thomas often “chilled” the discussion. She insisted she operated separately from her husband. When the panel told her that Trump-aligned attorney Cleta Mitchell testified under oath that Thomas had asked her about potential fraud in Georgia’s elections, Thomas said she could not recall the conversation. “I don’t have any memory of it,”
It seems Mrs Thomas is engaging in plausible deniability. Plausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for actions committed by or on behalf of members of their organizational hierarchy. She introduced Sidney Powell.
From the AP News report, a text to Meadows a week after the election in which she suggested attorney Sidney Powell “will help the cavalry come and fraud exposed and America saved.” Thomas explained to investigators that at the time she didn’t really know Powell, and as she learned more in the weeks to come, “I kind of got off that train.”
“I think it might be a unanimous view of everyone on this call and in this room that I don’t know how many of you would want your texts to become public on the front page of The Washington Post,” Thomas said, referring to the first reports of her communications. “I understand that,” said California Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democratic member of the committee. “And I’m sure you’re right, no would like to see their personal texts in the newspaper.” She is still a white woman so her Karen ability came through at the end.
One of the most alarming aspects of this phenomenon is the way in which these conservative liars have been able to gain a following of loyal supporters who blindly believe their every word. These individuals have been carefully groomed by these leaders to accept any and all information fed to them, regardless of its validity. They have been trained to view any dissenting opinions or facts as ‘fake news’ and to only trust the sources that align with their own beliefs. This creates an echo chamber of misinformation and reinforces the lies being spread by these conservative leaders.
One of the most notorious examples of this is the false narrative surrounding climate change. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence, conservative leaders continue to deny the existence of this global crisis and spread misinformation about its causes and consequences. This deliberate denial of facts has not only hindered progress in addressing this urgent issue, but it has also put the lives and livelihoods of millions of people at risk.
Conservative liars have also mastered the art of twisting the truth to fit their own agenda. They use fear-mongering tactics to manipulate their followers into believing that certain groups or individuals pose a threat to their way of life. This has led to a rise in xenophobia, racism, and discrimination, as well as a dangerous erosion of basic human rights.
Furthermore, these conservative liars have no qualms about using their platform to spread conspiracy theories and baseless accusations. They often hide behind the guise of ‘alternative facts’ and ‘freedom of speech’ in order to push their dangerous narratives. This not only further polarizes an already divided nation, but it also undermines the foundations of democracy and the importance of truth and accountability in a society.
In the midst of all this chaos and deception, it is crucial for individuals to be vigilant and critical of the information they consume. Blindly following and supporting these conservative liars only perpetuates the cycle of manipulation and deceit. It is time for accountability and for the truth to prevail over political agendas. Only then can we truly create a society that operates on integrity and honesty, rather than the empty promises and deceitful tactics of those in power.
The 14th amendment removed Trump from a ballot last night in Colorado. Here is the transcript:
Transcript
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
About The Author
1 thought on “From Ginni to Clarence Thomas, From Mark Meadows to Donald Trump, The Election Interference Into Joe Biden’s Very Obvious Win Reads Like A Whose Whose of Conservative Prevaricators”